<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple to the Core: Why Steve Jobs is buying PA Semiconductor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splittingtimes.com/2008/05/apple-to-the-core-why-steve-jobs-is-buying-pa-semiconductor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splittingtimes.com/2008/05/apple-to-the-core-why-steve-jobs-is-buying-pa-semiconductor/</link>
	<description>splitting times - it's about the things that realy matter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iphone &#187; Apple to the Core: Why Steve Jobs is buying PA Semiconductor</title>
		<link>http://www.splittingtimes.com/2008/05/apple-to-the-core-why-steve-jobs-is-buying-pa-semiconductor/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Iphone &#187; Apple to the Core: Why Steve Jobs is buying PA Semiconductor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splittingtimes.com/?p=49#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] splitting times wrote an interesting post today on Apple to the Core: Why Steve Jobs is buying PA SemiconductorHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt &#8230; e looking at the next iPhone chip, or perhaps the one after. That is very unlikely&#8230;.But it is very unlikely — almost impossible — that this acquisition was based with the iPhone in mind. Then why did Apple do it?&#8230;Of course that doesn’t mean Apple couldn’t switch to PA silicon for the iPhone over time&#8230;.PA Semi has aimed at workstation and server and high-power embedded chips that use far too much power for any iPhone&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] splitting times wrote an interesting post today on Apple to the Core: Why Steve Jobs is buying PA SemiconductorHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt &#8230; e looking at the next iPhone chip, or perhaps the one after. That is very unlikely&#8230;.But it is very unlikely — almost impossible — that this acquisition was based with the iPhone in mind. Then why did Apple do it?&#8230;Of course that doesn’t mean Apple couldn’t switch to PA silicon for the iPhone over time&#8230;.PA Semi has aimed at workstation and server and high-power embedded chips that use far too much power for any iPhone&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
